Authorities in Hong Kong have taken into custody thirteen people on suspected charges of involuntary manslaughter related to the recent catastrophic blaze, amid growing public outcry over the detentions of civilians demanding responsibility.
Rescue teams persisted in combing through the seven towers of the Wang Fuk Court estate in the Tai Po district on Monday, following the most fatal blaze in 75 years. The number of fatalities rose to one hundred and fifty-one and is expected to rise further as the operation continues. About 40 people are currently missing.
The housing complex, home to almost five thousand people, had been undergoing extensive renovations that have been linked to the origin of the blaze. In the wake of the tragedy, public fury has grown over alleged previous safety breaches by the contractor working at the location and lax enforcement of safety codes, spurred on by revelations that occupants had been voicing concerns over the work for a twelve months.
On Monday afternoon, officials said anti-corruption authorities had detained 13 people over the tragedy so far, including the executives and an engineering consultant of a contracting firm, and had “promptly initiated comprehensive investigation along the lines of manslaughter”.
A top administrator stated that seven of 20 tested specimens of the mesh netting used around the towers did not meet fire-retardant standards. Preliminary checks had found materials were up to code, but the spokesperson said the less expensive, substandard material had been installed in areas difficult to access in order to avoid discovery, labeling it a “shameful act”.
“They just wanted to profit at the cost of people’s lives,” the official stated.
As accusations of safety violations mount, alongside revelations that government authorities had issued several seemingly ignored cautions, the public have asked why no officials have yet been held accountable. Conversely, two civilians were reportedly taken into custody by national security police.
One individual, named as a Hong Kong student, was arrested over an internet appeal that made “four requests” for assured assistance for the affected families and responsibility for those at to blame, including any negligent or responsible public servants.
Local media said the student was arrested for “seditious intention”. Law enforcement did not confirm the arrest, saying only that they “will act according to actual circumstances and in accordance with the legal framework”.
News outlets also covered the arrest of a former district councillor.
Questioned about the detentions, the security chief said there had been “misleading statements online” that were aimed to threaten public security. “Therefore, we must take necessary steps, including law enforcement measures,” the official told a press conference. “Operational details cannot be revealed as they concern state security.”
On Hong Kong social media, people criticised the arrests of civilians. “State security must be given precedence even if the dead are still buried in the building,” said one.
Several users drew comparisons to mainland China. “The mainland, these crimes are called ‘creating disturbances’,” said a user. “It’s usually punished with severe penalties. Social order overrides everything.”
Another said: “Now that we are following mainland China’s approach, by dealing with the person who asks questions, no one will dare to ask, and therefore the city's administration will have no issues.”
The detentions came after advisories by security officials that they would take action against anyone considered to be exploiting the incident to incite “anti-China” feelings.
Prior to the arrests, officials had already begun showing increased vigilance to the public reaction. Following the suppression of earlier protests, public assemblies have been strictly regulated. In the immediate aftermath, community volunteers quickly organized relief efforts, with hundreds of people using cars and public transport to deliver mountains of garments, supplies and other necessities for the victims.
However, by evening, officers were monitoring the area, and public authorities soon assumed control from the volunteer organisers.
The petition over which the student was reportedly detained was initiated late on Friday. Its “four demands” mirrored the language of past campaigns but did not advocate systemic reform.
The individual told reporters that he was only “putting forward very basic requests”.
“If these ideas are considered subversive or ‘crossing the line’, then I feel I cannot foresee the consequences of anything any more, and I can only do what I truly believe is correct,” he said.
A seasoned luxury travel writer and lifestyle curator with over a decade of experience exploring exclusive destinations and high-end trends.